imprisonment as required by NRS 34.724. See Coleman v. State, 130 Nev. , 321 P.3d 863, 867 (2014). Therefore, because Amack did not meet the imprisonment requirement of NRS 34.724, he was not eligible for post- conviction habeas relief. See id. For this reason, we affirm the decision of the district court to deny the petition. 2 Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J.

Pickering

cIL-5SC J.

Parraguirre

0i2011 , J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Turco & Draskovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 Although the district court incorrectly addressed the procedural bars, we nevertheless affirm because the district court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A