petition for a writ of eoram nob is because they were claims arising from alleged factual errors that are on the record, the claims could have been raised earlier, or they involved legal and not factual errors. See id. at , P.3d at 601-02. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J.

Pickering

a.--th et J.

Parraguirre

J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge David August Kille Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (D) 1947A 44Sto