Feazell (Doneale) v. Warden
Feazell (Doneale) v. Warden
Opinion
statement of the fact finders of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for disciplinary action; and (3) a qualified right to call witnesses and present evidence. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-69 (1974).
Specifically, appellant was allowed to call witnesses and was given access to an inmate law clerk in preparation for his hearing. Further, some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary hearing officer, Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and therefore, appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Pickering
CLAA )(12-4g26) 5
Parraguirre
C:15/2aili J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge Doneale Feazell Attorney General/Ely White Pine County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.