Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Feazell (Doneale) v. Warden

Feazell (Doneale) v. Warden
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 11, 2014
Feazell (Doneale) v. Warden

Opinion

statement of the fact finders of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for disciplinary action; and (3) a qualified right to call witnesses and present evidence. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-69 (1974). Specifically, appellant was allowed to call witnesses and was given access to an inmate law clerk in preparation for his hearing. Further, some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary hearing officer, Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and therefore, appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Pickering

CLAA )(12-4g26) 5

Parraguirre

C:15/2aili J. Saitta cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge

Doneale Feazell

Attorney General/Ely

White Pine County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.