Douglas v. Filon
Opinion
recognized as true, Buzz Stew, LLC u. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228, 181 P.3d 670, 672 (2008), do not establish a violation of a constitutional right. 2 See Christopher u. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 414-16 (2002) (explaining generally what must be alleged to sustain a viable access-to-the-courts claim); Snyder v. Nolen, 380 F.3d 279, 292-93 (7th Cit. 2004) (Easterbrook, J., concurring) (recognizing that, in the context of an access-to-the-courts claim, "opportunities to correct mistakes before a suit reaches its conclusion means that there is no constitutional problem in the first place"). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J. Hardesty a4f, ger J. Douglas cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge
Eric T. Douglas
Jillian Prieto
Eighth District Court Clerk reaching this conclusion, we have given due consideration to In appellant's November 20, 2012, "Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss" and the authorities cited therein.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.