Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Paniagua v. Dist. Ct. (Bustamante)

Paniagua v. Dist. Ct. (Bustamante)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 21, 2014

Paniagua v. Dist. Ct. (Bustamante)

Opinion

adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief.

Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

J Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge J.M. Clouser & Associates, Ltd. Law Offices of Robert L. Hempen II Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.