D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (Arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.)
Opinion
demonstrating that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally available, however, only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; and the right to an appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Having considered the petition and appendix filed in• this matter, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J. Hardesty
J.
cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge
Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP
Angius & Terry LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.