demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; NRAP 21(b)(1). The district court has discretion to grant or deny continuances. See Bongiovi v. Sullivan, 122 Nev. 556, 570, 138 P.M 433, 444 (2006). We note that the continuance here was not indefinite, but rather the district court set discovery deadlines for June 2014. Under these circumstances, we conclude that extraordinary writ relief is not warranted at this time. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

Hardesty

J.

Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge, Family Court Division Michancy M. Cramer Michael P. Rhodes Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A