Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Hill v. Cox

Hill v. Cox
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 2014

Hill v. Cox

Opinion

complaint. See NRCP 3 ("A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court."). Thus, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. SeeS Moore, 90 Nev. at 393-94, 528 P.2d at 1020-21.

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

cet...tx J.

Hardesty

J.

Chsza Cherry

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Charles H. Hill Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

'We have considered the proper person motions that appellant has filed, conclude that they do not warrant reversal, and deny them as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1947A d e

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.