Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Sells, Jr. v. Nev. Board of Parole

Sells, Jr. v. Nev. Board of Parole
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 2014
Sells, Jr. v. Nev. Board of Parole

Opinion

incident would result in his being punished twice for the same action in two different jurisdictions. The district court denied appellant's writ petition and, on appeal from that determination, he reiterates the arguments that he advanced before the district court.

The Double Jeopardy Clause under the United States Constitution protects a defendant from both successive prosecutions and multiple punishments for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688,695-96 (1993); see also Nev. Const. art. 1, ยง 8; Jackson v. State, 128 Nev. โ€ž 291 P.3d 1274, 1278 (2012) (recognizing that the federal and Nevada Constitutions provide the same protections against double jeopardy). Double Jeopardy protections, however, are not implicated here because the purpose of the parole revocation hearing at issue in this case is to determine whether the Parole Board will reinstate appellant's original sentence for the underlying crime due to his apparent parole violations, not to punish appellant for the conduct that led to the parole revocation hearing. See United States v. Brown, 59 F.3d 102, 104-05 (9th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that the revocation of parole is viewed as the reinstatement of a previous sentence, not as punishment for the actions resulting in the revocation). This is true even if the parolee is subjected to more than one parole revocation based on the same underlying act, as appellant alleges is the case here. See United States v. Clark, 984 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding that the revocation of both probation and supervised release related to two prior convictions based on a single action by the offending party was permissible and did not implicate double jeopardy). Accordingly, we conclude that the

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A me, district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's petition for a writ of prohibition, Reno Newspapers, 126 Nev at , 234 P.3d at 924, and we therefore

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

\CA.-k Lat-aai ,J. Hardesty

J. Douglas

, J.

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge

William Cato Sells, Jr.

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (G) 1947A e

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.