Having considered the petition and its accompanying documents, we are not satisfied that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. As a general rule we will not review challenges to evidentiary rulings by way of a mandamus petition because these rulings are discretionary. See Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist.

Court, 127 Nev. „ 262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011). Moreover, petitioner has an adequate remedy at law by way of an appeal should he be convicted. See NRS 177.015(3). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

veg.4-c Hardesty

Douglas Cherry

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Louis C. Schneider, LLC Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e