Morales (Rafael) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
Having considered the petition and its accompanying documents, we are not satisfied that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. As a general rule we will not review challenges to evidentiary rulings by way of a mandamus petition because these rulings are discretionary. See Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. „ 262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011). Moreover, petitioner has an adequate remedy at law by way of an appeal should he be convicted. See NRS 177.015(3). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
veg.4-c Hardesty
Douglas Cherry cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Louis C. Schneider, LLC
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.