Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Centeno v. Dist. Ct. (u.S. Bank, Na)

Centeno v. Dist. Ct. (u.S. Bank, Na)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 8, 2014

Centeno v. Dist. Ct. (u.S. Bank, Na)

Opinion

P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Here, petitioner challenges the justice court's exercise of jurisdiction over the underlying unlawful detainer action and alleges that the justice court has improperly issued a temporary writ of restitution and refused to transfer or stay the case pending petitioner's district court quiet title action. Having considered the documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we deny the petition. Id.; NRAP 21(b)(1).

It is so ORDERED.

J.

Hardesty

J.

cc: Hon. Cynthia L. Cruz, Justice of the Peace Martin Centeno Tiffany & Bosco, P. A.

Las Vegas Justice Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.