Neuman v. Dist. Ct. (Bradley)
Neuman v. Dist. Ct. (Bradley)
Neuman v. Dist. Ct. (Bradley)
Opinion
intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered petitioners' arguments in light of the underlying case's progression since the challenged orders were entered, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Id. Consequently, we decline to exercise our discretion to consider this writ petition, NRAP 21(b); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Susan Scann, District Judge • Law Office of Arthur W. Tuverson Barney C. Ales, Ltd. E. Brent Bryson Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (th 1947A el.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.