Hughes v. Dist. Ct. (Johnson)
Hughes v. Dist. Ct. (Johnson)
Opinion
In this case, petitioner seeks disqualification of the district court judge assigned to his case. But the appendix that petitioner filed in this court does not provide any indication that petitioner filed an appropriate motion in this district court, as required by NRS 1.235, to disqualify the district court judge. Therefore, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that the petitioner shall provide in the appendix all documents "that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pickering Poem t IteL,:ntreesmaigamm, J.
Parnairre
ditta.
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Danny L. Hughes Goedert & Associates Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.