Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Purcell v. Acquired Capital I

Purcell v. Acquired Capital I
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 2014

Purcell v. Acquired Capital I

Opinion

motion to set aside a judgment based on fraud be filed no more than six months after the date that written notice of entry of the judgment or order was served. Written notice of the entry of the order approving the stipulated judgment was filed more than six months before appellant filed her NRCP 60(b) motion. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Parrakiirr

cTis Saitta

cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Patricia K. Purcell Kern & Associates, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 947A '40P

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.