Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Hartman (Derrick) v. State

Hartman (Derrick) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 10, 2014

Hartman (Derrick) v. State

Opinion

violations. Because the claims are belied by the record, we conclude they lack merit, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

J.

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

'The fast track statement does not comply with the provisions of NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have margins of at least one inch on all four sides. See NRAP 3C(h)(1) (requiring fast track filings to comply with the provisions of NRAP 32(a)(4)-(6)). We caution appellant's counsel that future failure to comply with the rules when filing briefs may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.