Mullen (Michael) v. State

(1987). The prior guilty plea agreement is not invalid merely because Mullen was not informed that the conviction could be used as an enhancement in the future, see id. at 274 n.2, 737 P.2d at 1164 n.2, and there was no detrimental reliance because nothing in that agreement limited the use of the conviction for enhancement purposes, see Speer v. State, 116 Nev. 677, 680, 5 P.3d 1063, 1065 (2000). We conclude that the district court did not err, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Pickering Pitt tup P J.

Saitta cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge William B. Terry, Chartered

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A en,