Pletcher v. Dist. Ct. (Boulevard Theater, LLC)

NRS 34.160; Int? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Writ relief is typically not available, however, when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int? Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Having considered the petition and its attachments, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is not warranted, as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in that, once a final judgment resolving all of the claims in the underlying case has been entered, see Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (clarifying that "a final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs"), he may appeal from that judgment to the extent that he is aggrieved. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (providing that whether to consider a writ petition is within this court's discretion).

It is so ORDERED.

Hardesty t or

Douglas

1741

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Mitchell Pletcher

Eric Smithers

The Williamson Law Office, PLLC

Ray Sankovich

Caruso Law Offices

McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno

Gordon Silver/Reno

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A