(2004). Writ relief is generally available, however, only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, and the right to an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted and we therefore deny the petition. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; NRAP 21(b)(1). In particular, with regard to the unbundled counsel issue, the district court did not bar petitioner from utilizing unbundled counsel, but simply required that any requests for representation by unbundled counsel be made, in advance, through an ex parte motion. Nonetheless, our denial of this petition does not preclude petitioner, if aggrieved, from raising any of the issues addressed in this petition as part of an appeal from any final judgment entered below.

It is so ORDERED.

J.

Douglas

cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division Law Firm Express Kelleher & Kelleher, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk