In a timely response to our show cause order, appellant argues that the August 7 judgment should be appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1), as it effectuated the costs award as required by NRS 18.120 and NRS 18.180. Respondent replies that this court has allowed appeals from several orders that are not self-executing, such as orders granting motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, and that, here, only the July 10 order was appealable.

The August 7 judgment is not appealable. In Campos-Garcia u. Johnson, Nev. , P.3d (Adv. Op. No. (4, August IL, 2014), we explained that judgments that merely duplicate earlier, appealable orders are not themselves appealable. Here, the judgment did not disturb or revise either the rights and obligations settled in the final summary judgment or the terms of the July 10 post-judgment costs award. As a result, the judgment was superfluous and unappealable. Id. As appellant failed to timely appeal from the July 10 award, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, C.J.

VI itet'ac Pickering Hardesty

J: J.

Parraguirre Doug

J.

Saitta

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA

(0) 1947A cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Jeffrey A. Dickerson Holland & Hart LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A