Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

The City of N. Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (5th & Centennial, LLC)

The City of N. Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (5th & Centennial, LLC)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided August 7, 2014
The City of N. Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (5th & Centennial, LLC)

Opinion

jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. Either writ is an extraordinary remedy, and whether such a writ will be considered is within this court's sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Moreover, it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered petitioner's arguments in light of this court's resolution of the consolidated appeals in Docket Nos. 58530 and 59162, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 679, 818 P.2d at 851, 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

, C.J.

, J. rut-, j Saitta cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge

Marquis Aurbach Coffing

Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP

John Peter Lee Ltd.

Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of our resolution of this writ petition, petitioner's emergency stay motion is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF 2

NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.