Coleman v. Dongray
Opinion
An unpub|is|‘led order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TI-IE STATE OF NEVADA
TIYA COLEMAN, No. 65030
Appellant,
VS- F § LED
BRYAN DONGR.AY, ‘
Respondent. AUG l l 2014
TRA.ClE K. L\NDEF\AAN
CLERK C>F SUPREME COURT
BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
D P TY CLE
On l\/lay 22, 2()14, this court granted appellant"s motion for an extension of time to file the civil proper person appeal statement Per our l\/Iay 22 order_, appellant’s civil appeal statement was due to be filed by June 23, 2014. In granting this ext»ension, we noted that appellant’s failure to file and serve her appeal statement within the allotted time may result in the dismissal of this appeal as aband0ned. To date, appellant has not filed the civil appeal statement or otherwise responded to this court’s directive Accordingl'y, we conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and we therefore
ORDER this appeal DlSl\/IISSED.
Parraguirre o Saitta cc: Hon. William B. Gonzalez, District Judge, Family Court Division Tiya Coleman
Throne & Hauser su.=nEMEcQu-T Eighth District Court Clerk oF
NEvAoA
0> mm _"_i \ l"'l ‘2 ll lli
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.