demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments and the documentation before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

Pickering

Pairaguirre Saitta

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Roberts Stoffel Family Law Group Pecos Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

light of this order, we deny petitioner's request for a stay that In was included in her writ petition.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A