Flaherty v. Martin
Flaherty v. Martin
Opinion
_ ¢L))-l§av h An unpub|ishuad order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA `MATTHEW PIERCE FLAHERTY, As N@. 64666 AN INDIVIDUAL AND As GUARDIAN AD LITEM FoR MACKENNA RY'AN F § L E D FLAHERTY, As INDIVIDUALS, AND As BENEFICIARIES UNDER THE AUE 2 n mm ANDREW M. FLAHERTY LIVING TRUsT As YToTALLY AMENDED AND Mg< ,;¢?»W»%E;#€;;L:R, RESTATED DATED DECEMBER 11, »v.£_____‘ DEPU?Y CLERK 2006, AND AS HEIRS OF THE AMF IRREV() CABLE TRUST ESTATE GF ANDREW-MARTIN FLAHERTY, Appellants, vs. ROBERT MARTIN, AND INDIVIDUAL; AND l\/[ARTIN & ALLISON, LTD., A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is hereby dismissed The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). lt is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME CO'URT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Paul H. Schofield, Settleinent Judge SuPnEME CouRT JOhll P€t€l` L€€ OF ~EVADA Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Eighth District Court Clerk CLEF\K’S ORDER /4-~ 275(»3
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.