Do v. Mendoza
Do v. Mendoza
Opinion
_ roman An unpub|ishll:d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
NHAN THANH DO, No. 65157 Appellant, g E vs. IGNACIO MENDOZA, F L " Respondent. Au@ 25 2014 TRAC\E K\ UNDEMAN CLER F SuPREME c<JuRT BY ‘ DE uTY c\.& ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is hereby dismissed The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). lt is so ORDERED.
CLERK ()F THE SUPREME COURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: §!Qll| d §llw§§l@i cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge John Walter Boyer, Set.tlement Judge Prince & Keating, LLP Richard Harris Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK’S OFIDEF| H~Z?‘?‘!Y
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.