Hasty v. Dist. Ct. (Leibowitz)

court's discretion. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Id. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the writ petition and appendix, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is not warranted, as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from any final judgment entered in the district court action. Id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

It is so ORDERED.

XR-041n , J. Hardesty Douglas lif7/ #9 de ,J. r)\,z(t YtA-v

Cherry cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge

Law Offices of Douglas R. Johnson Naomi R. Arin Marquis Aurbach Coffing Law Office of S. Don Bennion Eighth bistrict Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF 2 NEVADA

(0) I947A