Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

State v. Dist. Ct. McDearmon (Amber)

State v. Dist. Ct. McDearmon (Amber)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 9, 2014

State v. Dist. Ct. McDearmon (Amber)

Opinion

An unpub|ishLd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TI-IE STATE OF NEVADA THE STATE or NEVADA, N@. @2984 Petitioner, VS. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ooURT oF THE STATE oF NEVADA, F l L E D IN AND FoR THE ooUNTY oF CLARK; AND THE H0NoRABLE S~Ep g g gmi DAVlD B. BARKER, DISTRICT JUDGE, E K. L|NDEMAN ReSpOnd€ntS, cLELf<AC` SL:PREME comm and AMBER l\/lCDEARl\/ION, DE Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges an order of the district court denying a motion to reopen the criminal case against the real party in interest based on a fraud upon the court. Petitioner has filed a notice of withdrawal of the petition.

Accordingly, we O_RDER this petition DISl\/[ISSED. /"x¢-A"e°#‘i\ .J.

Hardesty Dougla”`s / Cherry cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Attorney General/Carson Cit.y Clark County District Attorney Pitaro & Fumo, Chtd.

Eighth District Court Clerk SuF-HEME CouRT OF NEvAoA (0)1941.»\ ah

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.