that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered petitioners' arguments and the documents before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NEAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

•=-Kett AA; j.

Hardesty

Douglas ir

J.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP Bernstein & Poisson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (7:4049