demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered petitioner's arguments and the documentation before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRAP 21(b)(1); NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

Hardesty

Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. Kenneth E. Pollock, District Judge Prestige Law Group Goodsell & Olsen Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1047A