Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Seaman v. Dist. Ct. (Miller)

Seaman v. Dist. Ct. (Miller)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 2014

Seaman v. Dist. Ct. (Miller)

Opinion

Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the writ petition, we conclude that petitioners have not met their burden of demonstrating that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is warranted. See id. We therefore deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

It is so ORDERED.

C.J.

Pickering Hardesty

Parraguirre Douglas

Cherry Chu. Saitta

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Hafter Law Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Las Vegas Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.