warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Id.; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

i LA. cEstA ,J.

Hardesty .

/ , •"Ay J.

Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP Canepa Riedy & Rubino Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Las Vegas Luh & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ern