is warranted. Id. Petitioner failed to attach any documents in support of his petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4). Nevertheless, petitioner asserts that he has filed a motion to modify custody in the district court, which is still pending, and that a temporary custody order has been entered. While petitioner raises concerns with certain elements of the custody proceeding in the district court, because he may challenge those elements on appeal from an order finally resolving the custody motion, we conclude that petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the form of an appeal and writ relief is unwarranted. NRS 34.170; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

J.

Hardesty DgAll J.

Douglas

'While it appears that petitioner failed to serve his petition as no certificate of service was filed with the petition, because we determine that denial of the petition is appropriate, no further action is required in this regard.

We direct the clerk of this court to file the proper person document provisionally received in this court on August 11, 2014, and in light of this order we conclude no action is necessary in regard to this document.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division Edward P. Opperman Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ex.