Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Milbourn v. Legrand

Milbourn v. Legrand
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 2014

Milbourn v. Legrand

Opinion

prosecuting his or her case. Petitioner has not otherwise identified any authority supporting an entitlement to relief.' Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. 2

Hardesty

, J.

Douglas

h$2.4t.notl, , J.

Cherry

cc: Richard L. Milbourn Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

'Additionally, petitioner contends that he is entitled to damages in the event that his requested relief is not provided, citing to NRS 34.670, which is limited to habeas corpus actions. Petitioner has labeled his petition a personal injury complaint and provided no basis on which to conclude that issues of habeas corpus are implicated. Likewise, the record contains no basis to support petitioner's contention that NRS 205.320 or any conduct amounting to extortion is at issue. We conclude that neither of these purported bases warrant relief.

We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's July 31, 2014, motion for leave to file this petition, and the motion is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.