Goff, D.O. v. Dist. Ct. (Smith)
Goff, D.O. v. Dist. Ct. (Smith)
Goff, D.O. v. Dist. Ct. (Smith)
Opinion
court has held that the right to appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 679, 818 P.2d at 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
-L Hardesty . pet-li n
J.
cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (en
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.