Mayo (Arthur) v. State
Mayo (Arthur) v. State
Opinion
Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). Furthermore, Mayo stipulated to the sentence he received in his guilty plea agreement.
Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
So, pea J.
Hardesty
J.
Douglas cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (C) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.