Martinez (Anthony) v. State
Opinion
An unpub|ishlled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTHONY EUGENE MARTINEZ, No. 64968
Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, z § L E w
Respondent. SEF 1 3 2014
DEF'UTY CLERK
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of burglary Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge.
Appellant Anthony Eugene Martinez contends that the district court erred by denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Martinez fails to explain how the district court erred and offers no argument in support of his contention.c Accordingly, we decline to consider it, see Maresca 1). State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987), and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. ~/ ‘l"" '£'“”‘i\ , J.
Hardesty
Douglas Cherry d cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
Sunnemz Counr
OF
NEvAnA town ms v l ' w y v g n /¢.]L~§/[Ol
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.