Martinez (Anthony) v. State
Martinez (Anthony) v. State
Opinion
An unpub|ishlled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTHONY EUGENE MARTINEZ, No. 64968 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, z § L E w Respondent. SEF 1 3 2014 DEF'UTY CLERK ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of burglary Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge.
Appellant Anthony Eugene Martinez contends that the district court erred by denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Martinez fails to explain how the district court erred and offers no argument in support of his contention.c Accordingly, we decline to consider it, see Maresca 1). State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987), and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. ~/ ‘l"" '£'“”‘i\ , J.
Hardesty Douglas Cherry d cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Sunnemz Counr OF NEvAnA town ms v l ' w y v g n /¢.]L~§/[Ol
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.