Davis (Ivory) v. State
Opinion
information contained in a PSI "must promptly seek to correct any alleged inaccuracies"). Even assuming that Davis expected the district court to correct the PSI when she brought the errors to its attention, she did not object when it neglected to do so and fails to demonstrate plain error which affected her substantial rights. See NRS 178.602. 2 Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
/ , J. Hardesty
Douglas
J.
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
Cofer, Geller & Durham
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
2 Daviswas not prejudiced at sentencing because the district court acknowledged that the names in the offense synopsis were inaccurate and disclaimed reliance upon the errors.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.