Clark (Charles) v. State
Opinion
merit. Appellant acknowledged his understanding in his guilty plea memorandum and during his plea canvass that his sentence was up to the discretion of the district court and that no one had made him any promises not contained in the guilty plea memorandum in exchange for his plea. We therefore conclude that the motion was procedurally barred, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
4c Hardesty , ,L.4-i n J.
J.
J.
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge
Charles Lee Clark
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A 914e10
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.