In the Matter: B.L., a Minor

Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. In particular, NRS 432B.330(2)(c) provides that a child may be in need of protection if the person responsible for the child's welfare caused the abuse or neglect of another child who resided with that person. Here, the district court concluded that petitioners failed to establish that B.L. was a child in need of protection from real parties in interest, and petitioners have not met their burden of showing that the district court's decision constituted an arbitrary or capricious abuse of discretion or was in excess of the court's jurisdiction. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J• Hardesty

4•S

Douglas cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Special Public Defender

Stephanie M. Keels

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A 0