Pinder v. C/O Ashby
Pinder v. C/O Ashby
Opinion
4 roy-son An unpub|isl ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
VINCENT HENRY PINDER, No. 65665 Appellant, vs. C/O ASHBY; SGT. WITTER; AND F E L E RENEE BAKER, WARDEN, Respondents. SEP'Z 6 2014 ¥\' ' ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL °Epmv °"ER“ This proper person appeal was docketed in this court on May 14, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s n0tice. Accordiiigly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed It is so ORDERED.‘ CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN ~\ BY; y ccc Hon.iSteve L. Dobrescu~, District Judge Vincent Henry Pinder _ Attorney General/Carson City White Pine C0unty Clerk lln light of this disposit'ion, all pending motions are rendered moot. ' SL»PREME Counr or NevAon CLERK’S OFlDEFl /4-5£058
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.