Seaman v. Miller
Seaman v. Miller
Opinion
v 101-1941 m An unpub|ishuzd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VICT0RIA sEAl\/LAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 66502 AND CLARK 00UNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL C,OMMITTEE, A DOMESTIC NoN-PRQFIT c0RP0RA'r10N, Appellants, _ EB,_..E Ross MILLER, IN Hls 0FF1c1AL CAPACITY As THE »SECRETARY 0F gm o 5 2014 STATE 0F NEVADA; JOSEPH GLORIA, ,RAC,E K_ MMAN IN ms OFFHJIAL CAPACITY As wm FS~»=»=€~=E@»»»RT CLARK COUNTY REGISTRAR oF "" VOTERS; AND MEGHAN SMITH, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondents.
§iz, ;.._..*'
ORDE'R DISMISSING APPEAL On September 23, 2914, appellants filed a document entitled, "Notice of Withdraw of Appeal," which we construe as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs, NRAP 42(b), and we ORD ER this appeal DISMISSED.
CLERK 0F THE SUPREME CGURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: §NQ!L`), l §,N.§|§l@ cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Hafter Law Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Las Vegas MREME com Attorney General/Carson City 0= Eighth District Court Clerk N EvADA CLEFIK'S OF!DEFI H - `330@|
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.