Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Grimaldi v. Dist. Ct. (Valley Health Sys., LLC)

Grimaldi v. Dist. Ct. (Valley Health Sys., LLC)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided October 14, 2014
Grimaldi v. Dist. Ct. (Valley Health Sys., LLC)

Opinion

222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Specifically, petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. We also note that petitioner delayed seeking writ relief from this court, adding to the expenditure of party and judicial resources in the district court were we to intervene. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'

J.

Parraguirre Saitta cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge

Patin Law Group, PLLC

Baker Law Offices

Marquis Aurbach Coffing

Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk

1 In light of this order, we deny as moot petitioner's motion for a stay.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.