State, Dep't of Transp. v. Gendall Trust
State, Dep't of Transp. v. Gendall Trust
Opinion
An unpublis d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.} IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THE STATE OF NEVADA, ON No. 65918 RELATIONS OF ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, mm THE ALEXANDER GENDALL AND LILY GENDALL TRUST; AND _ OCT 2 2 20"!
CARMIC, INC, A NEVADA i TRACE K. LmDEMAN CLER l , CORPORATION, W K ‘5”: S JPREME COMET Res ancients. : "DEgUT‘? CLERK 3’ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulatian of the 'partieej and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall "bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRA? 423(k)).
It is; an DRBERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACER K. 1" Elv
BY: cc: Hon. Valerie J. Vega, District J mng Chapman Law Firm, RCILas Vegas Attorney GaneralfLas Vegas Attorney GeneralfCarson City Law Offices of Kermitt L. Waters Eighth District Court Clerk 0F aux-192M; Baum NvaA CLERK‘S ORDER 502494: «@130 ;.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.