Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Shining Sand Ave Trust v. Flagstar Bank

Shining Sand Ave Trust v. Flagstar Bank
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided November 3, 2014
Shining Sand Ave Trust v. Flagstar Bank

Opinion

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order.'

J. Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. ii900....atyysmett7 j. Parraguirre cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge

Greene Infuso, LLP Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas O'Mara Law Firm, P.C.

Eighth District Court Clerk 'The injunction imposed by our February 24, 2014, order is vacated. SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.