Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Wells Fargo Bank

Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Wells Fargo Bank
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided November 3, 2014

Sfr Investments Pool 1 v. Wells Fargo Bank

Opinion

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief, REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss, AND REMAND this matter for proceedings consistent with this order.

Pickering

J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

ItC1241 Parraguirre , J.

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge David A. Rosenberg Howard Kim & Associates Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.