association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's decisions thus were based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

Pit J.

Pickeri

L-0 , J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, NA., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the4 controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

— rek..flOtt.-06 -1-- Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Howard Kim & Associates Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A afao,