interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief AND REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this order. 1

geku tiA, J.

Pickering

J.

Saitta

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC V. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

a7 —1-4 J.

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Kerry P. Faughnan Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1 The injunction imposed by our September 20, 2013, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I9474