REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND for proceedings consistent with this order.

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A .Cesp