Milbourn v. Legrand
Milbourn v. Legrand
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RICHARD L. MILBOURN, No. 66191 Petitioner, vs, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ROBERT LEGRAND, WARDEN; EMPLOYEE CLERK, SGT.; AND NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents, FILED and NOV 1 4 2014 JOHN C. LAMBROSE, TRACE K. LINDEMAN Real Party in Interest. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT EY ___,S.,2LierlaSk DEPUTY CLERK r—
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a proper person original petition for• extraordinary relief. Petitioner, an inmate, asserts that he is entitled to immediate discharge from prison due to an order entered by the federal court in 1994.
He also requests monetary damages and asks that this court incarcerate all other parties in this matter. Having considered the petition filed in this matter,' we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. See Smith v.
'Petitioner did not file an appendix in support of his petition.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(D) 1947A e l'I -3fl22 Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991); see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. 2
J.
Hardesty
J.
e, h-sl rlift.
J.
Cherry
cc: Richard L. Milbourn Attorney General/Carson City Federal Public Defender/Las Vegas
2 Because we deny the petition, we also deny petitioner's July 31, 2014, motion to appoint counsel. Further, although petitioner requested emergency treatment of his petition, he failed to demonstrate that emergency treatment was warranted. NRAP 21(a)(6); NRAP 27(e).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ci9j2D4ro
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.