Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Sheikh v. Dist. Ct. (Henry)

Sheikh v. Dist. Ct. (Henry)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 2014

Sheikh v. Dist. Ct. (Henry)

Opinion

222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Moreover, writ relief is typically available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition and joinder thereto, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

Douglas

Cherry ChstartAte- . 1

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Hutchison & Steffen, LLC Maddox, Isaacson & Cisneros, LLP Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen, & McKenna Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1411A e

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.