PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal.

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Greene Infuso, LLP Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ea